Quantcast
Skip to main content

Obama’s FBI Destroyed Evidence in Hillary Email Scandal

screen-shot-2016-10-05-at-11-42-18-pm

If this is true, the American public, and I am speaking about the patriots that care about our country, will go nuts.

According to Fox News, Republicans are pressing a report that shows the FBI, headed by James Comey, agreed to destroy the laptops owned by Hillary Clinton aides. The same aides were also given immunity, which basically destroyed the FBI’s case against Clinton in the end.

Congressional Republicans are demanding answers from the Department of Justice – informing Loretta Lynch that the action of destroying evidence stopped them from doing their job properly.

cte7t_4umaatxel

From Fox News:

The letter, signed by four Republican committee chairmen, follows allegations Monday that immunity deals for former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson included a side arrangement obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices.

Sources said the arrangement also limited the search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015. This meant investigators could not review documents for the key period after Clinton’s use of a private email and server as secretary of state became public.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., first asked Lynch about the terms in a letter Monday and co-signed the latest letter Wednesday along with House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah; House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif; and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

The lawmakers asked specifically about letters from attorney for the aides Beth Wilkinson that described the restrictive terms — and were recently reviewed by committee staff. The Republicans expressed “concern” that the “FBI inexplicably agreed to destroy the laptops knowing that the contents were the subject of Congressional subpoenas and preservation letters.”

The letter repeatedly cited Congress’ interest in the “evidence” that may have been jeopardized under the side arrangement.

The new letter asked Lynch why the FBI agreed to destroy the laptops and, significantly, what legal authority the FBI has to destroy records subject to a congressional investigation or subpoena. The letter also asked if the FBI followed through and in fact destroyed “evidence” from the laptops or the laptops themselves.

Asked for comment, a Justice Department spokesman said: “We have received the letter and are reviewing it.”

It’s not a mystery. Hillary Clinton has been and is currently being protected by the Obama administration. It doesn’t take a PhD to understand that she has the administration’s secrets and they are taking no chances in them getting out into the open.

What I don’t understand is, before the FBI destroyed the evidence there was a subpoena put in place by Congress. Since the FBI destroyed the evidence, why hasn’t Congress had those who violated the subpoena arrested?

Those people who support Hillary Clinton for President obviously don’t have a problem with their leaders being above the Law.

The Obama administration, the FBI, and the Justice and State Departments planned this cover up from the very beginning. Nothing Congress has done or will do will make a huge difference, even though Rep. Trey Gowdy has put his heart and soul into it. We, the American people, need to vote for Trump to break the Clinton corruption!

What do you think about this news and do you think the Republicans are keeping this in the news cycle to hurt Clinton? Share your comments below and let me know what you think about their decision to go after the DOJ.

Comments

2 Comments

  1. Martin says:

    There is a BIG HOLE in the US Constitution. While Congress can investigate only the Executive Branch can prosecute. Consequently, if Congress investigates someone in the Executive Branch or someone the Executive Branch wants to protect, the Executive Branch can refuse to prosecute. The only recourse then is impeachment. In the highly polarized and partisan Congress, absent the party who Congress is attempting to impeach committing an atrocity, it is unlikely that the partisan chambers in the House and in the Senate will be able to garner the 2/3rd vote in the House to impeach and the 2/3 res vote in the Senate to convict. In the case of an atrocity, treason, etc… maybe the political pressure brought to bear on the obstructing party would be great enough that a sufficient number of them would break party ranks and vote to impeach and/or convict.

    IMHO this is a big HOLE. The Congress needs some way to indict and to prosecute for criminal acts when the partisan DOJ refuses to act. Yes there is the concept of a Special Prosecutor but again in a polarized partisan Congress there have to be enough votes in one party to appoint a Special Prosecutor.

  2. Cliff says:

    IF CLINTON GETS THE WHITE HOUSE,THE ELECTION IS RIGGED.
    IF THAT HAPPENS,AMERICA,WILL BE FOREVER LOST.
    THE ELECTION MUST BE ON THE UP AND UP,BUT,WITH CLINTON,WE KNOW,IT WILL NOT BE
    WHY VOTE,IF OUR VOTES DON’T COUNT
    IF AMERICA IS TO SURVIVE,WE MUST NOT LET THIS HAPPEN.

Advertisement