Quantcast
Skip to main content

Criminal Sues Homeowner After He DID THIS STUPID Thing!

B9317595755Z.1_20150603164919_000_G9TAVP8B9.1-0

When homeowner David McLaughlin found all-around good guy David Bailey breaking into his garage in Dunkirk, Indiana in April of 2014, he shot him. But Bailey, who survived, is now turning the tables on the man he was trying to rob and is suing him for damages.

McLaughlin, the homeowner (who I personally think needs to work on his aim), was inside his home when he heard the alarm go off in his garage. He picked up his gun and went to investigate. Outside, he found Bailey in an alley, still in the felonious act (despite the very loud alarm).

It is unclear just how bad Bailey’s aim actually is, or if he indeed–as the new lawsuit claims–“exited his residence and began firing his weapon into the air in response to a security alarm sound in his garage.”

In his suit, Bailey contends he “had not entered [McLaughlin’s] garage” and “never entered the defendant’s garage for the purpose of stealing property.” He does not explain why he was there when the alarm was going off, or what exactly he was intending to do in the garage once he would have successfully broken into it….

From Daily Mail:

McLaugh’s attorney, Brian Pierce, told Fox 59 that the lawsuit is ‘outrageous’.

‘My client thinks it’s outrageous and I tend to agree,’ Pierce said. ‘You don’t ordinarily expect someone to burglarize you and turn around and sue you for damages.’

The lawsuit states that McLaughlin ‘owed the plaintiff a duty to exercise reasonable care when he exited his property and began firing gunshots down a dark alley’.

‘I think the claim is absurd. In Indiana every homeowner has a right to defend their property and that may include using a firearm,’ Pierce told Fox 59.

Pierce believes that Bailey will not receive any money from the lawsuit.

Watch this video below:

The burglar claims McLaughlin “continued to the public-right-of-way [and off his property] and continued firing his weapon down the dark alley.” This, right here–while totally understandable–is why McLaughlin will likely lose this lawsuit.

One of those rounds that McLaughlin fired, according to the complaint, caused “serious and permanent damage.”

And though Bailey plead guilty to burglary, he didn’t do any jail time. Instead, they sent him home with some electronic jewelry.

McLaughlin, the homeowner–Mr. Warning Shot–he went to jail for 60 days. And the lawsuit asks for “a monetary award in an amount sufficient to compensate [the burglar] for all damages.”

Now watch this:

H/T – Daily MailFox 59

Do you think the burglar will win the case? Share your opinion below and let us know what you think about this story. Don’t forget to share this on your Facebook and Twitter timeline.

 

Comments

Advertisement