When liberals talk about gun control, you’ll notice that it’s always the “scary” guns they talk about banning.
The weapons are always described as “semi-automatic,” and more often than not, “assault” weapons. While this rhetoric may be convincing for someone with no knowledge of guns, it’s laughable for someone with one. “Semi-automatic” simply means that when you pull the trigger, one bullet comes out at a time. One can only wonder why these liberals haven’t realized that they aren’t called “automatic” weapons for a reason. As for so-called “assault” weapons, the criteria for what makes a firearm an “assault weapon” is cosmetic features, not mechanical features.
Knives, fists, and hammers kill more people in America than rifles do in any given year, yet it’s only “assault rifles” we hear about banning.
It’s actually handguns responsible for most gun homicides and crimes, but we never hear liberals talk about banning handguns. Even though we’re all aware that gun control doesn’t work, liberals certainly think it does, so why don’t they go after the kind of firearm that kills the greatest number of people? Because they’d be even LESS successful in attempting to push gun control than they already are.
Despite how Hillary may portray her “common sense” gun control stance, never trust someone as two-faced as her.
A report by the Washington Times confirms Hillary Clinton would ban “some of the most popular” firearms in America if elected to the White House.
Moreover, the report shows she would chip away at the Second Amendment with myriad new gun control laws and regulations.
The sentence above is key. Liberals aren’t going to enact gun control in one fellow sweep with a piece of legislation banning all firearms and then mandating their confiscation. It’s going to be death by a thousand cuts, where each additional “common sense” regulation makes guns more and more unacceptable until they’re gone entirely.
According to the Times, Clinton “reassures law-abiding Americans their firearms won’t be targeted” if she is elected. In reality, however, her gun controls are broad measures “that would affect Americans with no criminal records” while having very little impact on the behavior of criminals.
For example, Clinton is calling “for a reinstatement of the national assault weapons ban and a prohibition on high-capacity magazines.” The “assault weapons” ban would take a entire category of firearms away from law-abiding citizens, the very thing Clinton said she would not do, while the “high capacity” magazine ban would force law-abiding citizens to hand over their “high capacity” magazines to government officials or to otherwise destroy them.
All the while, criminals would retain their firearms and “high capacity” magazines and would benefit from the fact that they would immediately have a firepower advantage over disarmed, law-abiding citizens.
On the bright side for gun manufacturers, in the event of a Hillary victory this November, they’re going to see their sales surge to new heights before she takes office.
Don’t let Hillary violate your Constitutional rights – get the word out and share this post on Facebook and Twitter.
And if you want to see Hillary behind bars make sure to LIKE our Facebook page!!